The Summit City Scoop
Archives
"From Boys to Legends: Is Your Son the Next Tyler Robinson?"
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
Could Your Young Boys Grow Up to Be the Next Tyler Robinson? |
Inside the online world that shaped a killer and the quiet crisis unfolding in boys' bedrooms across America. |
 |
A man named Tyler Robinson was identified as the suspect in the fatal shooting of commentator Charlie Kirk following a multi-day investigation.
A brief timeline of the event:
On September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was fatally shot on the campus of Utah Valley University while seated and answering a question from the crowd.
On September 11, 2025, a family member contacted the Washington County Sheriff's Office with information that Robinson had either confessed to or implied responsibility for the shooting.
On September 12, 2025, Tyler Robinson turned himself in and was formally identified as the suspect.
During a Friday press conference, federal officials stated that several bullet casings recovered from a hunting rifle found near the crime scene had messages inscribed on them. Some were obscure. Others read like taunts. One casing read, “Notices bulges OwO what’s this?”, a line taken from anime meme culture. Another said, “Hey fascist! Catch!” One casing had only arrow symbols: up, right, and three down arrows. Another simply read “Bella ciao,” the title of an anti-fascist anthem turned meme by a Netflix series.
The messages were absurd. Then they were terrifying. What looked like nonsense to the average adult turned out to be something else entirely: signals, winks, fragments of an online language shared by an entire generation of young men raised not by their families or communities, but by Discord servers, YouTube clips, and group chats. And what happened at Utah Valley University may not be the end of a trend, but the latest symptom of a much larger one. This was not just about politics.
This was about boys. Our boys.
The Groyper Movement: A Culture Hidden in Plain SightAccording to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, Groypers are part of an emerging far-right youth culture defined by white Christian nationalism, anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, and hostility toward even mainstream conservatives like Charlie Kirk. Led by internet personality Nick Fuentes, Groypers mask their views in irony and memes, often using humor to make hate more palatable.
“They act like it’s a joke, but the consequences are real,” said Dr. Jean Twenge, a psychologist and author of iGen. “That’s what makes it dangerous. The delivery is ironic, but the worldview is very serious.” Pepe the Frog, once an innocent cartoon, has been transformed into a kind of digital mascot for these groups. The “Groyper” variant, an image of Pepe resting his chin smugly on his hands, is used as a calling card among Fuentes’s followers. Their forums use anime references, gamer slang, religious lingo, and white nationalist code, all mashed together into a language designed to keep outsiders confused. It is a world where boys like Tyler Robinson can immerse themselves for years without anyone around them knowing.
The Psychology of a Generation in CrisisWhy are boys especially vulnerable? Dr. Laurence Steinberg, one of the world’s leading researchers on adolescent development, has spent decades studying the teenage brain. “Adolescents are more prone to risk-taking and poor impulse control,” Steinberg explained. “Not because they don’t know right from wrong, but because the areas of the brain responsible for judgment and self-regulation are still developing.”
Young men, particularly those who are socially isolated or emotionally neglected, are prime targets for extremist recruitment. They want belonging. They want purpose. And the internet offers both in the form of ideology wrapped in humor.
Dr. Mary Anne Layden, a clinical psychologist at the University of Pennsylvania, emphasizes how meme culture affects mental pathways. “When you package a message inside a joke, the brain receives it differently,” she said. “It becomes easier to retain and harder to critically evaluate.”
In other words, radical memes do not work because they convince. They work because they bypass resistance.
The Funnel: From Joe Rogan to Nick Fuentes
It does not start with hate speech.
For many boys, the first exposure is a clip from Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson. These figures talk about purpose, fitness, and modern alienation. Their content is not extreme, but it plants the seed. The world is broken, and no one is telling the truth. From there, the algorithm steps in.
Next come influencers like Andrew Tate, who tell boys their failures are caused by feminism, softness, and weakness. Then Adin Ross, who turns toxic behavior into entertainment. Then Sneako, who blends self-help with paranoia. Then Fresh & Fit’s Myron Gaines and Walter Weekes, who deconstruct women into numbers and metrics. Then Hamza Ahmed, who offers spiritual masculinity that often crosses into social extremism.
These figures blur the line between empowerment and resentment. Their messages critique feminism as a threat to male success, promote “high-value men” as dominant and emotionally detached, and preach self-improvement that revolves around aesthetics, power, and control. “It starts with wanting to be better. Then it becomes about wanting to dominate,” wrote How To Do Things With Memes, a culture analysis Substack that tracks online radicalization patterns.
Their platforms, including YouTube, Rumble, TikTok, and Kick, reward outrage, aggression, and humiliation of others, especially women.
From Content to Cause
Once these influencers reshape a boy’s view of women, relationships, and society, more ideological figures like Nick Fuentes and the Groyper movement enter the frame. They validate the same resentments but direct them politically. They are anti-LGBTQ, anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic, and pro-authoritarian.
At this point, a boy who started by watching a Tate clip may now be in a Discord server where users talk about “cleansing degeneracy” or reference messages like “Charlie was first,” interpreting it as the symbolic beginning of a cultural reckoning.
The Algorithm Makes It Seamless
YouTube, TikTok, and Rumble do not distinguish between satire, self-help, and extremism. If a 14-year-old watches one Fresh & Fit video, he may be served Tate clips, Sneako rants, Adin Ross streams, and Fuentes speeches edited like memes.
The tech does not care about context. It just wants engagement. “Radicalization online isn’t a leap. It’s a drift. You don’t notice until you’re already in it,” said one Reddit user in a post on r/saltierthankrayt.
Counterpoint: Not Every Viewer Radicalizes
Some psychologists warn against oversimplifying the problem. Dr. Pamela Rutledge, Director of the Media Psychology Research Center, cautions against blaming content alone. “Media doesn’t radicalize in a vacuum,” she said. “Boys who are loved, supported, and socially connected don’t suddenly become extremists because they watched a video. There’s always an underlying vulnerability.” Rutledge argues that what we are seeing is less about the internet and more about a culture that has failed to teach boys how to be emotionally literate, connected, and secure.
Still, law enforcement is taking the online pipeline seriously. “We are seeing a new type of self-radicalized shooter,” said a federal analyst in the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit, speaking on background. “They’re not being recruited by foreign powers. They’re being recruited by content, jokes, group chats. And it’s happening fast.”
Parents: What to Watch For
Most parents do not speak meme. But that is no excuse to ignore the signs.
According to the Anti-Defamation League and Parents for Peace, common red flags include sudden hostility toward women, minorities, or LGBTQ people; the use of terms like “based,” “NPC,” “redpill,” “alpha,” “simp,” or “sigma”; spending excessive time on YouTube, Discord, Rumble, or Telegram; using irony or humor to defend harmful speech; rejecting mainstream media or school-based authority; and idolizing influencers like Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes, or others in the Red Pill space.
What can parents do? Stay emotionally connected. Ask questions without attacking. Monitor online activity, especially niche platforms. Encourage real-world friendships, creative outlets, and community involvement. Provide purpose outside of ideology.
Is Fort Wayne Doing Anything About This?
In Allen County, educators and community leaders are beginning to pay attention. A spokesperson for Fort Wayne Community Schools confirmed that staff have undergone new training in 2025 to identify early signs of online radicalization, including meme language and coded hate symbols.
The Bowen Center, a local behavioral health agency, has quietly expanded youth services focused on masculinity, emotional regulation, and online safety. According to their director of youth outreach, more boys are arriving with exposure to “Tate-type ideologies” and “performative aggression.”
“We’re not moralizing,” she said. “We’re meeting them where they are and helping them form an identity that doesn’t rely on dominance.” Meanwhile, the YWCA of Northeast Indiana has begun offering workshops for parents and partners of young men showing signs of online radicalization. One recent session was titled “When Memes Turn Mean: How Hate Hides in Humor.”
It is a start. But many worry it is not enough.
The Final Message
The most disturbing part of Tyler Robinson’s attack was not the violence. It was the silence that preceded it. The unnoticed transformation. The laughter, the memes, the hours online, the eye rolls at dinner.
There was no manifesto. Just bullets. And on those bullets, a message. Written in internet code, irony, and desperation.
This is not a story about Charlie Kirk.
It is a warning for every parent who thinks, “My kid would never.”
If you or someone you know is concerned about a loved one’s online behavior, here are resources:
|